Barter? but they were temples?
It is quiet, there is yet another amendment to the regulation, but a nice thing that I have "discovered" a few days ago ....
I had to sell a cell phone paid too much, just on Ebay, and purchased without a picture does not match the description ... the damage was already done!
I could try to sell the phone in the same manner in which it was sold to me by deception, but if we all do so it becomes a jungle ... and is not quite right.
Then I tried to insert the rod into the fateful phrase:
accept trade-ins, even partial, cell phones not locked. Reported description, equipment and real-world object. (You can add an assessment ... then we talk about it) ...
to tell the truth I did it for curiosity / invite users to participate in the auction.
Well I must say that I was almost shocked by the number of proposals that I have arrived in 2 days. They offered me all proposals were so advantageous to me that I had to reject them, to be fair ... I saw that posting the offers are even buying a number of proposals coming soon.
To conclude, I think a partial barter, may be attracting the attention of users and entice them, as they would like to attach to the object in an exchange value very often lower than the market (for want of habit, boredom, disaffection for ...).
Council objects to those who have "difficult" to sell to adopt this system. (Clearly, the item for sale must have a minimum of desirability)
0 comments:
Post a Comment